History of Bulgaria : Every Year



history of bulgaria
bulgaria
bulgarian history
bulgaria history
bulgarian empire
history of bulgaria every year
bulgaria every year
bulgarian
bulgaria map
history bulgaria
danzig hd mapper
the history of bulgaria
history
bułgaria
history of bulgaria countryballs
geography
historia de bulgaria
history of romania
bulgarians
bulgaria anthem
bulgarian anthem
kukeri
bulgaria country
bulgaria ww1
bulgarian memes
bulgária
countryhumans bulgaria
evolution
first bulgarian empire
gylala
history of
history of serbia
history of the world every year
history of ukraine
serbian history
volga bulgars
بلغاريا
balkans every year
basil ii
boris iii
bulgaria countryball
bulgarian mapping
bulgarie
europe every year
history of armenia
history of europe every year
history of poland
history of russia every year
kingdom of bulgaria anthem
mila rodino

36 comments

  1. Hello, just dropping the fact that the Turkic theory is A SPECULATION and it is not yet proven, but instead – proved to be inaccurate. Various sources like wikipedia still say that bulgars were turkic but even wikipedia pages DO NOT match up at this. HERE IS SOLID PROOF ABOUT THAT:

    There is no ANY real proof that Bulgars spoke turkic language, neider were turkic looking. In all Byzantium mosaics Bulgars are shown as Indo-European looking for example check this one (checkhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omurtag_of_Bulgaria) this was Kanas Omurtag and than check Ghengis Khan here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genghis_Khan) and you will see the difference between turkic people and bulgars. Weirdly Bulgars really look the same as thracians in the Kazanluck Tomb (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thracian_Tomb_of_Kazanlak)

    Also the title KHAN is speculative and the only proven title was of Omurtag's KANAS U BIGIM and KANAS probably became KNAZ, then KNYAZ and U BIGIM – U BOGIM (meaning both in old church slavonic and modern bulgarian King in God (King faithful to god) even Wikipedia says that Khan is speculative and there is no real evidence for using the title Khan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanasubigi

    REAL PROOF is the Omurtags stones https://bg.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9E%D0%BC%D1%83%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B3#/media/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Omurtag10_svik.jpg

    For wikipedia users here is proof that even wikipedia dont know if bulgars are turkic

    For example here we see that wikipedia says bulgars are turkic using the turkic title Khan:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulgars

    But here it says that Khan is just a speculative title and the only proven to exist title was Kanas Ubigi: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanasubigi

    Another proof is that not a single source or country ever called them turkic – neither Byzantium, neither Romans, but Hungarians for example were called Turki and their country was called Turkia by the Romans

    Old Great Bulgaria was called Patria Onuguria giving idiots a "proof" that it was turkic but actually it is a historical name related to Phanagor who discovered the land north of Black see, so it was named Phanagoria. Kanas Kubrat was raised in Constantinopole where he probably learned the name Phanagoria which he and his people probably became using but with time so it became the name of the Capital of Great Bulgaria. Later Phanagoria became Onogoria because the Ph- droped like in many other words, which explains why it was called Onogoria or Onoguria just like in one Byzantium source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Great_Bulgaria

    For Volga Bulgars they were the one assimilated to Turkic people, just look at the names and you will see that Kotrag (Bulgar name) is way way different from Talib bine ahmad, showing that not just they converted to islam, but they also became turkic speaking.

    It is biologicaly proven that once you have some genes you cant loose them 0%. which gives us explanation why modern Bulgarians do not have asian blood but people living in the area around volga still have high percent of Indo-European blood

    Also I noticed that exactly at the same (1:37) time both bulgaria converted to christianity and Volga Bulgaria to Islam and which is inclining me to think that there was a possible history falsification for Volga Bulgaria and just copypasting lot of history

    My personal theory is that due to political reasons during the communist rule it was told that we are turkic to show us that the Great Ussr saved us and thanks to Slavianization of Bulgaria it became civilazed state. In other words- no Russia – no slavs – no civilazed Bulgaria which also explains that why we know bulgaria existed before 681 but still today it is accepted that only when slavs united with bulgars Bulgaria became a state in 681.

    But actualy in the byzantium peace act it is written that Bulgaria just gain land and it is not reestablished. Also the byzantium fleet was only used when a HUGE DANGER is about to come and never was used to fight nomadic tribes, showing that Great Bulgaria just gained land,

    And volga bulgaria was not another country but Great Bulgaria was splitted in half by Azars which also explains why Both countries had the same name and were treated like one country by historians at that time.

    Kotrag and Asparuh were probably countroling different parts of the country (they were bolyars which form of rule later was used in Dunable bulgaria) while batbayan was the central emperor of the country which explains why every bulgar ruler gained land but this one stayed in the country

    Its not what wikipedia or Irechek or Russians or Bulgarians or Oxford says. It is just a little to know and just a simple logic

  2. WE TURKS WILL TAKE BACK BULGARISTAN AND SIRBISTAN BECAUSE WE ARE THE
    TRUE OWNERS OF THE LAND NOT THE PRESENT SLAVISIZED
    THEN WE WILL TAKE YUNANISTAN AND CYPRUS
    ERDOGAN= NEW OSMANLI EMPIRE 2021

  3. Bulgaria never came so down to Greece between 930 to 970, you forget that this was territory of the Byzantine empire for more than 1400 year's the longest last empire of the world. the Byzantine people was mostly greeks, speaking greek language having Greek customs,greek names,and coulture..Many times Bulgarian king's try to take land of Byzantines but the empire was to strong at this time and they fail.Instend of that through the greek orthodox prists cyrrilos and Methodius Bulgarian people with serbians and russian learn and finally accepted the orthodox religion.

  4. I fail to understand why Turkish trolls spam under
    Iran videos,

    China videos,

    Korea videos,

    India videos,

    Armenia videos,

    Greece videos,

    Bulgaria videos.
    Can't they understand that they are just making fools out of themselves? 😀

  5. No orthodoxy doesnt make them Bulgarian. they all define themselves as Bulgarian. Again see for yourself what a pomak is.

  6. So you talk about how awful was todor zivkov but you are proud that you expelled Bulgarians from odrin 🙂 who is a hypocrite

  7. Bulgarians have Turkic root. They are assimlated, they lost own language,own culture and own identity. They are turkic origin. Why do they hate to us? Usualy radical nationalist nations are not themselves. They need and they want prove themseves. It is deficiency complex syndrome. Themselves of these types of nations well know that they lost own identity in their subconscious. Therefore they became radical. Other example : Persians are other type of Bulgarians. Persians are radical nationalist too. Persians hate Turks and Arabs too. But half of persians look like turks,other half of persians look like arabs. Also Persian language is mix of turkic(agglutinative grammar+20% words) and arabic (40%words+alphabet +and phonetics). … Are americans are radical nationalist? Are sweden,norway,japanese and etc… nationalist? Even they dont know own history,they dont interesting in these themes. If you are real yourselves,why you are uncomfortable? If you are real yourselves,what is something that forces you to radicalize?😉 if you are uncomfortable and if you are radical ,because you lost your identity 😉 So,i want say : Nationalism is not bad but radical type is bad. I am 🇦🇿Azerbaijani turk. I dont hate any nations. I have respect to all nations. Love from Azerbaijan. Thanks….

  8. THE FROG
    Fatlinda Islami
    Is a 12 year old Albanian gender bender from Gostivar
    She is not a Turk
    She is an embarrassment to Turkish people
    Her behavior is Haram and unIslamic

  9. WE TURKS WILL TAKE BACK BULGARISTAN AND SIRBISTAN BECAUSE WE ARE THE
    TRUE OWNERS OF THE LAND NOT THE PRESENT SLAVISIED THEN WE WILL
    TAKE YUNANISTAN AND CYPRUS
    ERDOGAN= NEW OSMANLI EMPIRE 2021

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *